![]() |
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 228
|
...thanks Jim.
I have tried to see as many as I can, either in person or photographically. By sheer weight of numbers I can attempt a deduction about a particular kaskara (or a component such as a crossguard) but in the absence of reliable provenance it will remain a (hopefully) informed guess. If I don't say much it's simply because I don't know much and try to share the little I do know... The presentation comprised a provisional categorization of blades, crossguards and grips; some suggestions about the kaskara's possible history and development; its continued use. As I mentioned in another post earlier today, I would like to post a slideshow to the forum. Now, as to this particular example: the blade does seem quite old - the "European" star and moon are finely engraved, the etched star is rough - almost a graffito. The only other crossguard without a blade recess I've seen was also with an older blade so maybe that is some indicator of age. The "upper" langet is fully formed rather than vestigial - in my experience age again, as is the absence of file marks. The bulbous ridge between the langets might also by weight of comparison indicate age. Very curious - although I'm certain that the blade is forged, it is thin at its base so that it wobbles from the ricasso rather than nearer the point (as we see in the Youtube clips). The absence of the sun also intrigues me: there is simply no trace of its having been there. There again I could be wrong about all that
Last edited by stephen wood; 7th August 2010 at 12:23 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Arms Historian
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Route 66
Posts: 10,867
|
Now thats what I'm talkin about!!!
Beautifully stated and well placed observations Stephen, and never underestimate your own knowledge on these. Obviously you have well captured variances in the key features, and if I may, I admire your modesty. The truth is, there are no real 'experts', and all we do is express what we think or observe, regardless of the ultimate outcome. As most here know, I throw a lot of ideas and perceptions out there fully knowing I may well get blasted...in fact, often I hope I do, as long as better supported data is presented. David, who is another who I admire for his 'thinking outside the box' approach, has entered in some excellent notes here as well, on the usual application of celestial symbols on European blades, and keyed in on the most compelling anomaly of all on this example.....the etched pentagram in what appears a replacement position in the typical cabbalistic grouping. This is indeed an old European blade from what I can see, and as you note as well, the pentagram star is etched. This seems almost to fall keenly in place with the well established practice of acid etched thuluth inscriptions. Most of this activity seems to have taken place at Omdurman in the Mahdist period, but certainly the use of the process continued after the Mahdiya. Along with you and David , I am puzzled by the absence of the sun coupled with the addition of this most unusual element, this pentagram star. Aside from all the inevitable cracks about the occult, what must this symbol have meant to whoever applied it? You make very important notes on the structural components of the hilt and the thinness of the blade toward to top. As my knowledge on blade modifications is limited and David has noted possible shortening, could the blade root have been the point of shortening, and that end of the blade become thinner from stock removal, also losing the sun image? I very much appreciate your courtesy in offering to place a slide show on your presentation, and will see what more can be done on that. Speaking for myself, though I am sure for others here as well, I'm very proud to have one of our own members presenting before this extremely prominent society. Well done!!! ![]() All very best regards, Jim |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|