|  | 
| 
 | |||||||
|  | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes | 
|  24th October 2008, 02:05 AM | #11 | |
| (deceased) Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: Portugal 
					Posts: 9,694
				 |   
			
			Hi Michael, Thanks a lot for investigation and consequent revelations. Quote: 
  . Now, if you allow me the impertinence ... What if we don't (strictly) stick to terms ? Like if we are flexible to the extent that when we mention hook, this may as well be a figure of speech; after all, hooks have so many shapes ... i mean, what instead of mentioning hook, we just call it a 'device', comprehending hooks, lugs, stumps, when they all serve the same purpose?! If you allow me the correlation, i was reading about the appearance of the stock in portable firearms; the author reminds us that, after all, the stock is ( or also is) an implement to absorb the recoil. Is this 'reasoning' any 'reasonable' ? I know, in this case the human shoulder, or chest, plays the role of the wall. This is what happens when you pay attention to laymen  . If you don't have any more patience, just send me to that part  . Fernando | |
|   |   | 
| 
 | 
 |