Ethnographic Arms & Armour
 

Go Back   Ethnographic Arms & Armour > Discussion Forums > Ethnographic Weapons
FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 16th February 2008, 02:16 PM   #22
A. G. Maisey
Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 7,015
Default

Sometimes I get mighty pissed-off with myself.

I'm always telling people that I hate hypothesis without evidence or logical support and here I have been engaging in childish playing with random ideas instead of doing what I should have done in the first place:- gotten off of my fat butt and used my brain.

Reference :- Smithsonian Institution, United States National Museum Bulletin137, The Collection of Primitive Weapons and Armour of the Philippine Islands in the United States National Museum, Herbert W. Krieger, Washington Government Printing Office 1926. Pages 49-52.

Too much to quote here, but these spears with long thin shafts and the provision for fixation of a cord are most likely to be hunting spears,used as harpoons, not war spears.

The spear-thrower was unknown in the Philippine Islands.

If nothing else, I think this error of mine has clearly demonstrated how ridiculous it is to hypothesize on something about which one knows nothing.
A. G. Maisey is offline   Reply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:36 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Posts are regarded as being copyrighted by their authors and the act of posting material is deemed to be a granting of an irrevocable nonexclusive license for display here.