Nimcha: opinions and translations?

Tatyana Dianova · 20th June 2007, 09:12 AM

Ok, the scabbard is gone ... and it is gone forever...

Jens, I think you are right about the left side (the dot markings are on the opposite side of the blade if you look at the pictures 1 and 2).

Kirill Rivkin have sent me his opinion on the sword, which I find quite logical. Quote:
"I highly doubt that the blade is european in origin. The style of
eyelashes and the fact that the pattern is repeated many times suggest a
local copy. Arabic engravings on blade's sides look acid etched to me,
which likely indicates post 1860 origin. On the blade's back side there is
an engraving which seems to be year and signature, also I would not say
anything conclusive without better pictures. Acid etching on the blade
is most likely citations from Quran. Similar blades were produced by
almost everyone, the font does not seem to be Nastaliq, which means it is
likely to be non-persian. It does not seem like a classical caucasian
work either. I suspect it was made in late XIXth century in some part of
the Ottoman Empire, North Africa or other."
And also, in the next letter:
"I have looked at a few pieces and it seems that Zanzibar/North Africa was a little bit faster in adopting etching - 1820s or later, but the style still seems a little bit later than this to me."

I will try to make the better pictures of the inscription on the back side and post them later.

20th June 2007, 09:12 AM	#8
Tatyana Dianova Member Join Date: Dec 2004 Posts: 735	Ok, the scabbard is gone ... and it is gone forever... Jens, I think you are right about the left side (the dot markings are on the opposite side of the blade if you look at the pictures 1 and 2). Kirill Rivkin have sent me his opinion on the sword, which I find quite logical. Quote: "I highly doubt that the blade is european in origin. The style of eyelashes and the fact that the pattern is repeated many times suggest a local copy. Arabic engravings on blade's sides look acid etched to me, which likely indicates post 1860 origin. On the blade's back side there is an engraving which seems to be year and signature, also I would not say anything conclusive without better pictures. Acid etching on the blade is most likely citations from Quran. Similar blades were produced by almost everyone, the font does not seem to be Nastaliq, which means it is likely to be non-persian. It does not seem like a classical caucasian work either. I suspect it was made in late XIXth century in some part of the Ottoman Empire, North Africa or other." And also, in the next letter: "I have looked at a few pieces and it seems that Zanzibar/North Africa was a little bit faster in adopting etching - 1820s or later, but the style still seems a little bit later than this to me." I will try to make the better pictures of the inscription on the back side and post them later.