Ethnographic Arms & Armour
 

Go Back   Ethnographic Arms & Armour > Discussion Forums > Ethnographic Weapons
FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 8th June 2007, 07:05 PM   #4
fenlander
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 62
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bill Marsh
I had also heard that triangular cross section blades made worse holes.

But I would imagine that a hole in a person is as bad with any shape and the size and placement of the hole would count most.
Perhaps not.

Maybe a hole from a sinous balde would be harder to close up and more prone to infection etc etc. I was wondering if these blades were made this way to inflict more damage or just to look nicer. Andrew says that he believes it would not make any difference. Then why would anyone bother to forge sinous blades at all. Only for aesthetics ? Perhaps there was a percieved difference in damage infliction? Or was this only on cultural or aesthetic grounds ?
fenlander is offline   Reply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:37 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Posts are regarded as being copyrighted by their authors and the act of posting material is deemed to be a granting of an irrevocable nonexclusive license for display here.