![]()  | 
	
| 
			
			 | 
		#10 | |
| 
			
			 Member 
			
			
			
				
			
			Join Date: Jan 2006 
				Location: Kent 
				
				
					Posts: 2,658
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 Quote: 
	
   I have to agree with your comments. There is evidence that the 'smaller hand' theory is possible. I, myself found a reference to British 'pattern' swords that were supplied to the Indian conscripts with smaller hilts to accomodate their smaller hands. I,personally, am not convinced, I feel the restrictive hilt with the disc pommel aids the technique of Tulwar horizontal and circular cuts. When holding a Tulwar I have found that it can be gripped 'lightly' without fear of losing the sword. This 'relaxed' grip allows more flexibility in the wrist and elbow allowing quicker and more 'fluid' movement. Anyone could try this out with a stick, if you grip it tightly it 'locks' your wrist.....if you slightly relax that grip you can make that stick 'dance'.   ...At the point of 'contact' the grip can be tightened to 'accept' the 'shock' of the strike.If you try this 'loose grip' technigue on later pattern sword,( I have never handled a M1796 sabre   )the hilt slides through the fingers ....making it more likely you would lose the sword and control of the blade. When I referred to  Gatka videos in an earlier thread...a number of formites suggested that this was no more than a 'sword dance' ...I still disagree. Hi Jim and Jens, thanks for the info....it seems I will have to invest in 'Hindu Arms and Ritual' by Robert Elgood   Pukka Bundook, that book is graphic   Rudyard Kipling springs to mind..."If you can keep your head when all about you Are losing theirs ..........."  | 
|
| 
		 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
		
  | 
	
		
  |