![]() |
|
|
#20 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Europe
Posts: 2,718
|
Quote:
Different heating and maybe different chemicals used, as we do know they used different chemicals, could also be part of the process, but again, if so, why do we have so relativly few magnetic blades? Yannis, the way I see it, I think you are comming frightfully close - but I am guessing, I can't prove it . Your mail made me remember something said about enamel making, it was either in Jeypore Enamels, 1886, by Jacob and Hendley, or in Indian Art at Delhi 1903, by Watt. In one of the places the author writes that some of the secrets about enemal making has been told by a named Englishman, and the authors attitude was that he should not have told the secrets.If the attitude of the early writers was 'let the artists keep their secrets', one can not wonder why we find so few hints about magnetism in the books. We still have a puzzle or two, and one is Gene's blade. Why does the magnetism change four times? I have been told that it is no problem to do this, but there must be a reason for someone to use his time to make the blade magnetic like it is .Jens Last edited by Jens Nordlunde; 14th February 2005 at 11:59 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|