Some questions about Balinese hilt cup.

A. G. Maisey · Today, 12:49 AM

Balinese keris hilts that have a selut-like fitting or a cup that encloses the lower end of the hilt are not uncommon, what is uncommon, to the point of not being known by a couple of very experienced Balinese collectors is one of these cup type fittings with a longish stem.

I think enough examples of this fitting have been posted to verify that the fitting did exist at some time, & in some place, in the past, but we might have a bit of difficulty in nailing down exactly when & where.

One thing that is of interest in the photos in post #6. The lighter coloured sarung is a jejamprahan form, in olden times, this sarung form was the prerogative of people who were priests or religious leaders, & it needed to be paired with a kusia hilt --- a hilt form that was also the prerogative of priests & religious leaders.

The hilts in the photo posted are not kusia, they are bebondolan of the South Bali form. The bebondolan hilt is the common man's hilt used for everyday wear, it was improper to pair a bebondolan hilt with anything other than a batun poh or kajongan sarung, further, no common man could legitimately use a jejamprahan sarung.

The darker coloured sarung in post #6 is a kekandikan form. In olden times the kekandikan sarung form was the prerogative of rajas & nobles and it could not be paired with a bebondolan hilt. In modern times the kekandikan form is classified as a formal type of dress, only for use in formal or official circumstances, say, something like a wedding, or maybe attendance at a governor's party. Again, as a keris intended for formal wear, a bebondolan hilt should not be fitted. A kekandikan sarung should never be paired with a bebondolan hilt.

So, if we look at these keris & the way in which they have been dressed, in spite of the fact that they both show some age, the fact of the matter is that they are both dressed inappropriately for use in Balinese society, either in the past, perhaps prior to WWII, or in the current era.

If I see something like this, it does raise questions in my mind in respect of the authenticity of presentation of the keris concerned. Collectors & dealers have been playing around with keris from everywhere for a long time now, so if we see mismatched examples of dress it should automatically raise the question of where this keris might have been dressed.

In respect of post #6, the keris shown as "State keris Fig 87". Jensen names the area of origin for this keris as Bali/Blambangan, the Blambangan Kingdom ended in the 18th century, this area of far east Jawa is now the Banyuwangi Kabupaten. So what Jensen has said is that this keris is a "State Keris" from either Far West Bali or on the other side of the Bali Strait, Far East Jawa.

The dress of this keris does show Balinese influence, but it is very certainly not Balinese dress, it is Jawa/ Madura dress for people of Balinese descent.

Another thing it is not is that it is most definitely not any sort of "State Keris". It is the keris of a man who had no claim to either noble descent or royal descent, in other words, a keris that is dressed for use by a common man, but surely a very wealthy common man. There are several things about this keris that cause me to speculate that the entire keris might have been put together & then sold into Europe by a very well known Surabaya dealer who used to live in Jalan Ngagel Tama. I will not mention his name, he has moved to the Hidden World a long time ago.

If we look at Post #8, image showing Chapter 7, P.16 of "Kris Disc" , we are again looking at a "State Keris". This is not a "State keris", it is a keris for the common man, parts of it have some age, but parts of it are much more recent enhancements. Originally this would have been the keris of a man from the middle ranks of society, but with no claim to royal nor noble descent. It has had the dress upgraded from its proper style into a style that would permit a higher price tag & that would be more appealing to a buyer from outside Balinese society. As it is now presented, it has the earmarks of a dealer's montage. Again, possibly from Ngagel Tama, Surabaya.

Today, 12:49 AM	#10
A. G. Maisey Member Join Date: May 2006 Posts: 7,027	Balinese keris hilts that have a selut-like fitting or a cup that encloses the lower end of the hilt are not uncommon, what is uncommon, to the point of not being known by a couple of very experienced Balinese collectors is one of these cup type fittings with a longish stem. I think enough examples of this fitting have been posted to verify that the fitting did exist at some time, & in some place, in the past, but we might have a bit of difficulty in nailing down exactly when & where. One thing that is of interest in the photos in post #6. The lighter coloured sarung is a jejamprahan form, in olden times, this sarung form was the prerogative of people who were priests or religious leaders, & it needed to be paired with a kusia hilt --- a hilt form that was also the prerogative of priests & religious leaders. The hilts in the photo posted are not kusia, they are bebondolan of the South Bali form. The bebondolan hilt is the common man's hilt used for everyday wear, it was improper to pair a bebondolan hilt with anything other than a batun poh or kajongan sarung, further, no common man could legitimately use a jejamprahan sarung. The darker coloured sarung in post #6 is a kekandikan form. In olden times the kekandikan sarung form was the prerogative of rajas & nobles and it could not be paired with a bebondolan hilt. In modern times the kekandikan form is classified as a formal type of dress, only for use in formal or official circumstances, say, something like a wedding, or maybe attendance at a governor's party. Again, as a keris intended for formal wear, a bebondolan hilt should not be fitted. A kekandikan sarung should never be paired with a bebondolan hilt. So, if we look at these keris & the way in which they have been dressed, in spite of the fact that they both show some age, the fact of the matter is that they are both dressed inappropriately for use in Balinese society, either in the past, perhaps prior to WWII, or in the current era. If I see something like this, it does raise questions in my mind in respect of the authenticity of presentation of the keris concerned. Collectors & dealers have been playing around with keris from everywhere for a long time now, so if we see mismatched examples of dress it should automatically raise the question of where this keris might have been dressed. In respect of post #6, the keris shown as "State keris Fig 87". Jensen names the area of origin for this keris as Bali/Blambangan, the Blambangan Kingdom ended in the 18th century, this area of far east Jawa is now the Banyuwangi Kabupaten. So what Jensen has said is that this keris is a "State Keris" from either Far West Bali or on the other side of the Bali Strait, Far East Jawa. The dress of this keris does show Balinese influence, but it is very certainly not Balinese dress, it is Jawa/ Madura dress for people of Balinese descent. Another thing it is not is that it is most definitely not any sort of "State Keris". It is the keris of a man who had no claim to either noble descent or royal descent, in other words, a keris that is dressed for use by a common man, but surely a very wealthy common man. There are several things about this keris that cause me to speculate that the entire keris might have been put together & then sold into Europe by a very well known Surabaya dealer who used to live in Jalan Ngagel Tama. I will not mention his name, he has moved to the Hidden World a long time ago. If we look at Post #8, image showing Chapter 7, P.16 of "Kris Disc" , we are again looking at a "State Keris". This is not a "State keris", it is a keris for the common man, parts of it have some age, but parts of it are much more recent enhancements. Originally this would have been the keris of a man from the middle ranks of society, but with no claim to royal nor noble descent. It has had the dress upgraded from its proper style into a style that would permit a higher price tag & that would be more appealing to a buyer from outside Balinese society. As it is now presented, it has the earmarks of a dealer's montage. Again, possibly from Ngagel Tama, Surabaya.