Ethnographic Arms & Armour
 

Go Back   Ethnographic Arms & Armour > Discussion Forums > European Armoury
FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 17th April 2025, 10:56 PM   #6
Jim McDougall
Arms Historian
 
Jim McDougall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Route 66
Posts: 10,194
Default

Thank you so much!! especially for responding
I have had this saber since the 70s, and as I mentioned, it was termed a cavalry officers sword (?) but obviously this was atypical for any such thing.
The brass hilt, fluted grip and shorter blade clearly (as years later found) indicated a naval officers cutlass.
In a book by Wilkinson I found a match to this made by Durs Egg, identical ebony fluted grip etc. (cannot place title at the moment). As Egg did supply a lot of naval weapons it seems likely to support my idea (the one in the book was a frontispiece and not fully captioned).

I am inclined to agree on your date assessment, and Deakin as a partner only lasted until 1803. An article on this lurks about somewhere (I'll find it eventually). Wooley as I noted was heavily into the use of Montmorency section blades from the M1788s, and seems to have favored French affectations in hilts (his 1788 light cavalry hilt vs, Gill's which followed German form).
Jim McDougall is offline   Reply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:55 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Posts are regarded as being copyrighted by their authors and the act of posting material is deemed to be a granting of an irrevocable nonexclusive license for display here.