Ethnographic Arms & Armour
 

Go Back   Ethnographic Arms & Armour > Discussion Forums > Ethnographic Weapons
FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 28th March 2006, 08:55 PM   #8
Jens Nordlunde
Member
 
Jens Nordlunde's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Europe
Posts: 2,718
Default

Hi Tim,

It could be like you write, but I doubt it very much. Had it been so, I think they would have made a greater effort when writing the letters. There is another reason why I don’t think so, a reason which you could not know, and that is the blade, it has a chevron pattern but the pattern is a bit uneven, and I don’t think you would used such a blade for presentation. Remember that the hilt and the blade do not necessarily come from the same place – they could have, but not necessarily. Here is the whole tulwar, notice that the chevron pattern does not start until a bit down the blade.
One other thing, the blade has an armoury mark at the back - the mark (meaning K/Ka/Kha) and the number 33.

Attached Images
  
Jens Nordlunde is offline   Reply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:38 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Posts are regarded as being copyrighted by their authors and the act of posting material is deemed to be a granting of an irrevocable nonexclusive license for display here.