Ethnographic Arms & Armour
 

Go Back   Ethnographic Arms & Armour > Discussion Forums > Ethnographic Weapons
FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 16th September 2015, 05:09 PM   #7
mrcjgscott
Member
 
mrcjgscott's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 189
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sirupate
Nice Photo's Chris,
Thank you Sirupate.

Quote:
Originally Posted by sirupate
the Enfield mark was probably an inspection stamp
I think it is quite obviously an inspection stamp, just as one would find on swords and bayonets of the period, as I have already noted: "They are known amongst collectors as the Enfield kukri, due to the Enfield inspection marks found at the ricasso"


Quote:
Originally Posted by sirupate
I have handled some of these kukri, but for me like the Mk4 (for different reasons) they didn't handle in the way a kukri would be expected too.
You are of course, perfectly entitled to your own opinion. I, and quite a few others, respectfully disagree.


Quote:
Originally Posted by sirupate
Also when you check Gurkha movements and re-supply of men during WW1, you will notice there wasn't really a resupply problem from India
I think troop movements, and the manufacture and supply of kukri are two very separate things, and it would be a mistake to confuse the two.


Kind regards,

Chris
mrcjgscott is offline   Reply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:54 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Posts are regarded as being copyrighted by their authors and the act of posting material is deemed to be a granting of an irrevocable nonexclusive license for display here.