Ethnographic Arms & Armour
 

Go Back   Ethnographic Arms & Armour > Discussion Forums > Ethnographic Weapons
FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 31st May 2015, 06:35 PM   #7
rickystl
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: St. Louis, MO area.
Posts: 1,632
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kubur
Dear Rick,
Another extremely beautifull rifle!
I like the powder flask too!!
Have you seen Elgood's book on arms of Arabia?
He mentionned Persian barrels with some stamps quite similar to yours.
We have to wait Khorasani's book on Persian firearms.
I know that we have to be cautious with the origins of our objects, but I agree with you, your gun looks Persian to me.
Even if Caucasian arms were very popular amongst Persians, Ottomans, Russians and whatever! I don't like people who deny Persian influence on Islamic arms. The Khurasan was a major center of steel production and a major place for metal work. Persian steel was extremely popular with the Arabs. By the way, do you have nice damascus pattern on your barrel?
Best,
Kubur
Hi Kubur.
Thanks for your comments. No, I don't have Arms of Arabia. But I should. There are some copies available, but WHEW..THE PRICE! I guess I'll just have to bite the bullet and order a copy. I'm sure it won't get any less expensive as time goes on.
Is there a book coming out on Persian firearms? Is there a release date yet?
Yes, we know the Caucasian long guns especially were heavily Persian influenced. Not only the stock shape, but also the barrels and locks. The lock on this gun has the early sear arrangement. This, together with the other features, is why I would date this gun no later than the 1st Quarter of the 19th Century. Of course, I've been wrong before. But the evidence at present leads me to believe this is an early, all Persian made gun. Differing opinions are most welcome.
BARREL: While the barrel was off the gun and un-breached, both the gunsmith and myself tried to find some evidence of a damascus pattern. But even under magnification, we can't seem to detect any. Which I find surprising for a gun of this quality. But, as I mentioned, I believe the barrel and lock were chemically cleaned at some point. And the wrong chemicals can cause a fading of damascus pattern. But I just can't tell if this was the case.
The likely all Persian origins of this gun make it one of the most interesting in my collection. Thanks again for your interest.
Rick.
rickystl is offline   Reply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:16 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Posts are regarded as being copyrighted by their authors and the act of posting material is deemed to be a granting of an irrevocable nonexclusive license for display here.