|  | 
|  9th August 2014, 11:18 AM | #9 | 
| Member Join Date: Mar 2009 
					Posts: 1,064
				 |   
			
			Thanks for the clear pictures! Iam sorry but no matter how much you want to believe it, it is sure to be a later reproduction and not an original mace. the faint lines and very low quality of the fleur de lis in your pictures clearly show that it is a casting and no chiselling in relief. The mace from the berlinerzeughaus inv. nr4453 you posted, is of a totally different category, high quality carving and etching and non comparable to the coarse casting/workmanship of your mace. hereby also attached some pictures how a 16th-century mace should look. Best, Last edited by cornelistromp; 9th August 2014 at 11:45 AM. | 
|   |   | 
| 
 | 
 |