![]() |
![]() |
#33 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: College Park, MD
Posts: 186
|
![]()
Terrific and informative thread!
The slowness of opening and common lack of lock would certainly seem to make the navaja inferior for some purposes. But they also made them acceptable to carry. For an attacker, the slowness of the opening is less of a problem than to a defender. And, as was mentioned above, lack of a lock probably dictated more slashing. Consider a common weapon in American slums at the end of the nineteenth century--the straight razor. Portable, concealable, useful for other purposes, not inherently illegal, no lock, no thrusting capability, but a quicker open. |
![]() |
|
|