Flamberg Two-hand Swords, late 16th-Early-17th Century

		Ethnographic Arms & Armour > Discussion Forums > European Armoury
Flamberg Two-hand Swords, late 16th-Early-17th Century

Matchlock Flamberg Two-hand Swords,... 18th April 2012, 05:38 PM

Swordfish When I started collecting, I... 18th April 2012, 06:23 PM

Matchlock That's absolutely true. ... 18th April 2012, 06:27 PM

Dmitry Hmm. That's odd, because... 18th April 2012, 06:48 PM

Matchlock I know, Dmitry. I guess... 18th April 2012, 07:13 PM

Greybeard Hello Michael, first of all... 18th April 2012, 07:59 PM

fernando This is a bit of a drastic... 19th April 2012, 06:50 PM

fernando A couple XVI century... 19th April 2012, 07:28 PM

cornelistromp Omg, I have a couple of these... 19th April 2012, 07:34 PM

Dmitry What Michael calls Victorian... 19th April 2012, 09:47 PM

Matchlock Sorry, Dmitry, That's my... 19th April 2012, 10:43 PM

fearn Hmmm. I agree to some... 20th April 2012, 06:53 AM

Swordfish Everyone can do with his... 21st April 2012, 12:39 PM

Swordfish Twohander 21st April 2012, 03:05 PM

Dmitry What indicators are there... 23rd April 2012, 02:39 PM

Matchlock Hi Dmitry, I realize you... 30th April 2012, 02:48 PM

Matchlock Attached are two... 30th April 2012, 03:50 PM

fernando The first one, being called... 30th April 2012, 03:59 PM

Matchlock Exactly, 'Nando, And... 30th April 2012, 04:01 PM

cornelistromp there are only 2 longer... 30th April 2012, 02:26 PM

23rd April 2012, 02:39 PM	#15
Dmitry Member Join Date: Jul 2009 Posts: 607	What indicators are there that the swords in the Philadelphia Museum don't date to the late 16th-17th c., but are 19th-20th c. replicas? I'm talking about the swords with the chamfron on the previous page of this thread.

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is Off Forum Rules

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:42 PM.