![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Sydney Australia
Posts: 228
|
![]()
Thanks for your reply.
It's similar, yes. But not the same. Perhaps it is a precursor. Notice the bars in the front, which are much more prominent. Also the guard's a little different in shape. This is steel not brass. And the grip is silver wire wrap – the kind you find on18th century rapiers. This sword is huge. The blade is very long. It was actually described as an English (yes, English!) backsword - cavalry. But it's so Scottish in it's look I have to wonder. As you say, there's that 1798 pattern to consider, for a start. |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|