Ethnographic Arms & Armour
 

Go Back   Ethnographic Arms & Armour > Discussion Forums > Keris Warung Kopi
FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 26th August 2010, 04:17 AM   #9
A. G. Maisey
Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 7,015
Default

Thank you for your clarification, Semar.

As has often been stated in this Forum, it is extremely difficult to provide a supportable opinion on tangguh from even the very best and most comprehensive set of photographs.

However, having said that, I am more than prepared to state unequivocally that this blade does not resemble in even the smallest degree any blade that I would recognise as a candidate for classification as Majapahit.

I will go further, and state that it also does resemble in any way, any tangguh classification that I would recognise as possibly pre-dating Majapahit.

I will allow that it could perhaps come from the geographical location of Majapahit, ie , East Jawa, but at a much later date than the date which we associate with Majapahit, ie, pre 1525.

Still, tangguh is only an opinion, and we all have opinions that are inevitably based upon either our knowledge and experience, or perhaps our integrity. Others can accept or reject an opinion as it suits them.
A. G. Maisey is offline   Reply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:19 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Posts are regarded as being copyrighted by their authors and the act of posting material is deemed to be a granting of an irrevocable nonexclusive license for display here.