![]()  | 
	
| 
			
			 | 
		#9 | 
| 
			
			 Member 
			
			
			
			Join Date: Aug 2006 
				
				
				
					Posts: 608
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			While unashamedly an admitted novice on the keris, as an armchair student of history, I would think that given the "backend" religious factors driving the "front-end" cultural expression of the keris, it is a fair assumption the only realized difference resulting from a change in climate might have been in the materials (i.e., type of wood) used in creating the ukiran, warangka, & gambar.  Snow did not keep the Hindu religion from flourishing in the Himalayas; and the same forms of weaponry with only slight-to-moderate variations may be found along a wide range of latitudes from mountain peaks of Nepal to the tropical southern subcontinent.   
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	Of course, take my opinion for what it is worth: exactly what it cost... ![]() Now, on the other hand, if you're speaking of how the keris may have developed had it been indigenous to Finland, I think it might have looked something like this: ![]()  
		 | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread | 
| Display Modes | |
		
  | 
	
		
  |