![]() |
![]() |
#10 | |
(deceased)
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Portugal
Posts: 9,694
|
![]()
Hola Manolo
Quote:
If i well understand, in the old days picture taking was forbidden because, as cameras in interior premises had to forcingly operate with a flash, they could damage delicate matters like oil paintings and so, due to their magnesium bulbs ... is this correct? Then with the advent of sophisticated cameras that are able to 'shoot in the dark', some museums with common sense began allowing picture taking provising the flash was not used ... this still correct? Therefore those 'prohibiters' that exhibit objects which are not subject to flash damaging are wrong since the very beginning, whereas those that do not contemplate picture taking without a flash are second in line ... ignorance line, that is ![]() The only chance they have not to stand in such line is, as you sugest, the compeling for the acquisition of their photo books; then they may go to the unethical line instead ![]() Now a little story: when i asked the (rather appealing) lady in the Association if i could take pictures she told me that, in the first day of the exhibition she was told by some of the staff to stick a paper at the entrance forbidding picture taking; then someone with a higher rank saw the paper and told her to immediatelly take it off. Actually the marks of the paper were still in the door, as she pointed them to me. Fernando |
|
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|