![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Nipmuc USA
Posts: 514
|
![]()
I understand it as F for fils. I don't know if a link to SFI would cause a problem but a discussion over the decades. A quote from Robert Wilkinson-Latham
Quote:
See my inquiry post #6 in that thread and following replies. I approached this at SFI a few years ago and the contention was that Hoppe did not use the mark we see on this blade above, indeed dozens I have archived as blades meant for the US (eaglehead pommel swords). Others insist the book plate shared above is correct. Honestly, it would not be the first disagreement but it is a mark SHetFils and SH for a ciouple oof decades and while the jury still seems to be out and a very divided opinion, Helvig is how I approach the mark, vs Hoppe. Helvig in Alsace and Hoppe in Soingen. Cheers GC |
|
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|