Ethnographic Arms & Armour
 

Go Back   Ethnographic Arms & Armour > Discussion Forums > European Armoury

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 6th March 2017, 07:45 PM   #9
Jim McDougall
Arms Historian
 
Jim McDougall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Route 66
Posts: 10,200
Default

Hi Jean Luc,
Thank you, ya had me worried there my friend. You're usually right on these discussions!
Indeed it would be great to have information on regimental markings on these swords, but as previously noted, such markings were seldom used before the 19th century. For that matter there were no official regulation swords in Great Britain prior to those of 1796.

Of the relatively rare instances of marks applied, in many cases these were field applied by regimental quartermasters or sometimes individual soldiers, and on campaign these were not part of official record keeping. We can only surmise which units might be represented by initials of unit colonels or commanders as the units were commonly referred to by their names, i.e. so and so's regiment of horse or dragoons or of foot.

As always, a fantastic example of these amazing swords .

All the best
Jim
Jim McDougall is offline   Reply With Quote
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:16 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Posts are regarded as being copyrighted by their authors and the act of posting material is deemed to be a granting of an irrevocable nonexclusive license for display here.