Ethnographic Arms & Armour
 

Go Back   Ethnographic Arms & Armour > Discussion Forums > Ethnographic Weapons

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 28th July 2015, 01:06 AM   #26
mrcjgscott
Member
 
mrcjgscott's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 189
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim McDougall

Nothing conclusive of course, but I wanted to share some of the details of earlier debates and discussions with newer members and readers for them to pursue their own perspectives.
Certainly very interesting and a concisely written argument Jim, I can certainly see the merits of such a grip position.

The only thing I can contribute, from my days collecting British Indian swords, is that I owned an example of their P08 version of the 1908 Cavalry Sword, which was marked to the 33rd cavalry. It was slightly heavier than its British counterpart, and the grip was made from a native hard wood, as opposed to the gutta percha of the early British 1908's.

If anything the grip on the 33rd cavalry example was slightly larger than the British version, although I could not tell you why!

I still have images somewhere, if they would be of use?

Kind regards,

Chris
mrcjgscott is offline   Reply With Quote
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:12 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Posts are regarded as being copyrighted by their authors and the act of posting material is deemed to be a granting of an irrevocable nonexclusive license for display here.