![]() |
![]() |
#32 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 103
|
![]()
Hi, Ariel. Welcome aboard on 'keris forum'
![]() Mysticism vs science is a very tought matter, and will never end in one final conclusion. Just like discussing the God's existence. It is philosophers' "play ground". I do respect your doubtful and skeptic opinion on mystcism. Today's world is fulfilled with materialism and positivism point of view which eventually gave advance to the science and human civilization. (some, will argue that it is nature destruction and certainly not an advancement). Good philosopher would aware of limitation of science. It rely heavily on observation of phenomenon. An 'observation' would heavily rely on '5 senses'. Thus, blind men would observe the world quite different and make their own understanding on it. Red or blue, dark or light, have no meaning for them. And none of playboy's playmates is beauty/sexy. In fact, they may have their own understanding on 'sexy' ![]() Quoting Tanpoaran on "Sangkan Paraning Dumadi" (which unfortunately, I believe, only Javanese could read it ![]() ![]() ![]() Dear Mr. Manolo, I believe you have a quite good understanding ![]() ![]() Western approach would be to "control, dominate or overcome", while Eastern approach would always "seek in harmonies / balance". Understanding and giving some respect on this different approachs would "ease" our cultural understanding. Just my personal thought ![]() Last but not least, happy ramadhan too Pak Kiai Carita and all of you who are fasting. best regards. Last edited by Boedhi Adhitya; 17th October 2005 at 06:01 AM. Reason: addition |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|