![]() |
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 278
|
![]()
Appreciate if you guys could help to determine perhaps authenticity or tangguh of these kerises. One with Longer Pesi(tang) and the other with shorter pesi(tang).Regards, Mykeris.
Last edited by mykeris; 19th December 2008 at 12:34 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Keris forum moderator
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 7,211
|
![]()
MyKeris, i don't believe there is anyone whose opinion i would respect on tangguh who would be will to make such an opinion based solely on these photographs.
As for authenticity, if you are wondering if there has been revisioning to these keris i would say possibly, maybe even probably, but could i be sure??? ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 48
|
![]()
look like for me your putut kembar or some call it umyang jimbe is a keris "rombakan" a reshape from other dapur or other tosan aji.sory just opinion it is very possible im wrong.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 278
|
![]()
Thanks, perhaps focus on whether its genuine or non-genuine.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 238
|
![]()
IMO I would say that both are genuine putut kembar blades (made and intended to be putut kembar). The one on the left looks very old say early 20c or older (could be much older). But for the one on the right, I don't remember if I have seen a putut kembar featured with such a defined greneng, but then that is just based on my limited experience.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 278
|
![]()
Thanks for your great opinions, Rgrds, Mykeris.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|