![]()  | 
	
| 
			
			 | 
		#1 | 
| 
			
			 Member 
			
			
			
				
			
			Join Date: Jan 2006 
				Location: Kent 
				
				
					Posts: 2,658
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			Not quite an edged weapon ......but ethnographic never the less...but what is it? 
		
		
		
			The seller describes this as Dyak....it is 18cms high...carved bone in the form of a naked man 'displaying' his genetalia ...with a wooden 'point' (..........on his head   )....the lower section is hollow to accept some sort of shaft....apparently there is some remains of the original wood shaft still there. Is it a totem?....ceremonial spear? ...is it even Dyak?Has anyone any ideas.. .......(please not too many 'school boy' comments      )
		Last edited by katana; 21st October 2006 at 06:45 PM.  | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
| 
			
			 | 
		#2 | 
| 
			
			 Member 
			
			
			
				
			
			Join Date: Jan 2006 
				Location: Kent 
				
				
					Posts: 2,658
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			Been searching on the net,,,,found this image....no title ....no information...just a photo on a photography web site.... 
		
		
		
			So what ever it is ....there are more of them....  | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
| 
			
			 | 
		#3 | 
| 
			
			 Member 
			
			
			
				
			
			Join Date: Dec 2004 
				
				
				
					Posts: 951
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			It is not Dajak  
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	Ben  | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
| 
			
			 | 
		#4 | |
| 
			
			 Member 
			
			
			
				
			
			Join Date: Jan 2006 
				Location: Kent 
				
				
					Posts: 2,658
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 Quote: 
	
  
		 | 
|
| 
		 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
| 
			
			 | 
		#5 | 
| 
			
			 Member 
			
			
			
				
			
			Join Date: Dec 2004 
				Location: What is still UK 
				
				
					Posts: 5,925
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			The extended vulva  
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	   is often seen in African figures but really do not think they are African.  I wonder if they are not Philippine or from some of the smaller Indonesian islands.  I would not be able to tell if they were tourist stuff or not.  The confident but naive nudity makes me think they may just be okay.
		 | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
| 
			
			 | 
		#6 | |
| 
			
			 Member 
			
			
			
				
			
			Join Date: Jan 2006 
				Location: Kent 
				
				
					Posts: 2,658
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 Quote: 
	
   But artistic interpretation of the human form tends to be guided by censorship, public opinion, religious constraints and the Law ....no such restrictions in many ethnic environments.
		 | 
|
| 
		 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
| 
			
			 | 
		#7 | 
| 
			
			 Member 
			
			
			
				
			
			Join Date: Dec 2004 
				
				
				
					Posts: 951
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			Hi here are some pic s off Dajak charms these are from the famous ter Houten collection and was long in an museum in the Netherlands
		 
		
		
		
			 | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
| 
			
			 | 
		#8 | 
| 
			
			 Member 
			
			
			
				
			
			Join Date: Dec 2004 
				Location: What is still UK 
				
				
					Posts: 5,925
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			I think that they could also be Naga.  The conical male cap.  I have a bronze naked Naga pair of figures.  The male is depicted with a cap.
		 
		
		
		
			 | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
| 
			
			 | 
		#9 | 
| 
			
			 EAAF Staff 
			
			
			
				
			
			Join Date: Dec 2004 
				Location: Louisville, KY 
				
				
					Posts: 7,345
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			I don't think they are Filipino.  Naga is a good thought though.
		 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	 | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
| 
			
			 | 
		#10 | 
| 
			
			 Member 
			
			
			
				
			
			Join Date: Jan 2006 
				Location: Kent 
				
				
					Posts: 2,658
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			Naga definately seems a likely source....but I cannot find any conclusive proof...received it today ...the 'pointed hat' is horn (IMHO cow, it is hollow)and the bone has a nice patina and seems to be 'polished' by regular handling. 
		
		
		
			The 'hat' a small circle with a dot in the centre and 'mimics' the eyes...the positions of the 'circles' form a triangle....which could be relavent. If anyone has any ideas please let me know......I'm all 'googled' out  
		 | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
| 
			
			 | 
		#11 | |
| 
			
			 Member 
			
			
			
				
			
			Join Date: Aug 2006 
				Location: Java, Indonesia 
				
				
					Posts: 49
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 Quote: 
	
 hope this helps  | 
|
| 
		 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
| 
			
			 | 
		#12 | 
| 
			
			 Member 
			
			
			
			Join Date: Dec 2004 
				
				
				
					Posts: 1,712
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			I  notice looking at the figures face the eyes are round  &  the genitals circmcised.  I wonder if that provides any clues to origin? 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	Spiral  | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
| 
			
			 | 
		#13 | |
| 
			
			 Member 
			
			
			
				
			
			Join Date: Dec 2004 
				Location: Italia 
				
				
					Posts: 1,243
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 Quote: 
	
 Well, i don't know the origin ,but it seems nice. Congrats!!!  
		 | 
|
| 
		 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
| 
			
			 | 
		#14 | 
| 
			
			 Member 
			
			
			
				
			
			Join Date: Dec 2004 
				
				
				
					Posts: 951
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			Looks like it is batak but not old
		 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	 | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
![]()  | 
	
	
		
  | 
	
		
  |