![]() |
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 692
|
![]()
What was that?
6620913376 I've almost bid on that. Certainly not moroccan. Looks indian, has a ricasso, nice khanjar hilt, but.... ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 5,503
|
![]()
I agree, the dagger looks Indian and quite practical. No info on the quality of steel, but superficially looks OK, mid 20th century, perhaps?
As to the adjective Moroccan: please notice that the seller did not say that the dagger was Moroccan, only the leather. Moroccan leather is almost a trademark, more of a mark of quality and technololy than the origin. It is natural, mostly horse or camel, not bonded, very pliable and strong. Surprisingly, a lot of it is (and always was!) actually manufactured in Nigeria and brought to Morocco and from there to Europe. In Europe it was used for furniture, belts/bags and, especially, for book binding. If you see an 18th-19th century Bible with still astonishingly intact cover, it is likely to be covered in Moroccan leather. Lower quality stuff was bonded: layers and scraps glued on top of each other; those invariably started crumbling after ~ 10 years. I have a friend who is into "first editions" and this is as elementary to him as "turkish ribbon" vs. "hairpin" to us. In short, Moroccan leather is like Damascus steel: made anywhere, with Damascus as the distribution point. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|