Ethnographic Arms & Armour
 

Go Back   Ethnographic Arms & Armour > Discussion Forums > Ethnographic Weapons

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 25th January 2009, 10:08 PM   #1
stephen wood
Member
 
stephen wood's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 227
Default etched kaskara blade?

...here I go again

Just finished on Ebay - a museum apparently told the seller that it was mid 17th century...
Attached Images
    
stephen wood is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25th January 2009, 10:26 PM   #2
Jim McDougall
Arms Historian
 
Jim McDougall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Route 66
Posts: 9,719
Default

Hi Stephen,
This is one of the central fuller type blades often seen on kaskara, and does correspond to European trade blade forms, but I doubt the 17th century suggestion. Naturally further research or close examination of the blade in hand might reveal more.
It is hard to see from the photos, but the etching would correspond loosely to the acid etched broad stroke 'thuluth' calligraphy applied as motif during the Mahdist period on not only kaskara, but many of the weapons from the arsenals, especially Khartoum. It would be interesting to compare the etching here with the Mahdist examples.
Thanks again for sharing these kaskara subjects.

Best regards,
Jim
Jim McDougall is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25th January 2009, 10:52 PM   #3
stephen wood
Member
 
stephen wood's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 227
Default

...thanks Jim. I took the dating with a pinch of salt...

What about the tang? Isn't there usually a hole to secure the hilt? (see image) Also the tang looks like it was added rather than being an integral part of the blade. I general though I think it could be a kaskara...

The "thuluth" blades tend to be shorter, wider, blunt and thinner in my experience.


Re. the museum, the seller took it to Rochester Museum in the 80's...not as if Christopher Spring had a look
Attached Images
 

Last edited by stephen wood; 25th January 2009 at 11:42 PM.
stephen wood is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25th January 2009, 11:57 PM   #4
katana
Member
 
katana's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Kent
Posts: 2,653
Default

The maker is D.Peres ...

http://209.85.229.132/search?q=cache...lnk&cd=3&gl=uk

More pics of a similar blade .....it also explains the rivet hole in the tang. Although this has two.

http://pages.mikebrackin.com/5089/Pi...923313028.html

Also one discussed here
http://216.219.192.186/vb/printthread.php?t=4080

Regards David
katana is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26th January 2009, 12:51 AM   #5
stephen wood
Member
 
stephen wood's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 227
Default

...sorry for the confusion David - I posted the D.Peres image to illustrate that the tang usually has a hole - it's not the blade in question but a previous post.

Last edited by stephen wood; 26th January 2009 at 01:05 AM.
stephen wood is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26th January 2009, 02:21 AM   #6
katana
Member
 
katana's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Kent
Posts: 2,653
Default

Hi Stephen,
if I had looked 'properly' at the original pictures....I would have realised the D.Peres sword picture was not of the original posted .....Its been a long day !

The fuller is as wide as the rather short tang with little or no shoulder, also, the tang seems as 'thick' as the remaining metal's 'thickness' between the fullers.....seems 'weak' to me....and probably not to the original sword's spec. (assuming this was a functional weapon, and not ceremonial/talismatic or a tourist piece)The tang looks like its formed from 'stock removal' rather than forged.

Regards David
katana is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26th January 2009, 11:16 PM   #7
Jim McDougall
Arms Historian
 
Jim McDougall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Route 66
Posts: 9,719
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by stephen wood
...thanks Jim. I took the dating with a pinch of salt...

What about the tang? Isn't there usually a hole to secure the hilt? (see image) Also the tang looks like it was added rather than being an integral part of the blade. I general though I think it could be a kaskara...

The "thuluth" blades tend to be shorter, wider, blunt and thinner in my experience.


Re. the museum, the seller took it to Rochester Museum in the 80's...not as if Christopher Spring had a look

Hi Stephen,

With that 'optimistic' date thrown out so cavalierly, I completely agree, and if someone said Spring had made that assessment I would've fallen over!!

I'm not really well versed at commenting on the hilting process of these weapons, as most of my observation has been external, but I am inclined to think David is correct, the tang seems unusually short. (thank you for those links David!).

As we have seen, with the example you posted previous to this, the mounting and refurbishing of these weapons in Sudan, seems not to be simply a tourist intended cottage industry, but swords are still being traditional heirlooms that do often receive much older blades. In many Sudanese regions, especially Darfur I believe, the kaskara sword remains a proud traditional accoutrement, though not necessarily intended for actual use.
Perhaps that is why the tang on this one was short as it needed only to place the blade in the hilt, regardless of functionality.

It seems that the 'thuluth' acid etched blades are often decoratively applied, contrary to many of the meaningfully inscribed 'lohr' type panels carrying reverently placed invocations on most higher quality kaskara. Most of these profusely etched blades derive from the Mahdist period, and were of course produced for many years thereafter. I have never fully understood whether this decorative calligraphy was intelligible or not. In most cases of the very thoroughly covering use, it was not.

Thank you for the great graphics showing the mounting characteristics on these. It's truly helpful to see how these were put together!

All very best regards,
Jim
Jim McDougall is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31st January 2009, 09:27 PM   #8
stephen wood
Member
 
stephen wood's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 227
Default

...I have been able now to make some better images, including a negative (which can show the etching better).

Now that I've actually handled it I can add; it is actually very well-made and appears to be quite old - there are areas of pitting and wear. There is nothing of the rather "raw" look that some of the (short/wide/flat) etched blades possess.

It is 36" long (not including the tang), 2" at it's widest point tapering to 1 1/2".
Unsharpened. There is a single broad fuller. The etching consists of what appears to be a single 3-character "phrase" repeated along both edges and a longer "phrase" etched in the fuller towards the ricasso. Identical on both sides.

It is quite unlike any kaskara I have handled before - closer I think than anything I have seen to the Islamic swords that are said to be the kaskara's antecedent.
I wonder if anyone can pick out the script from the new images?
Attached Images
  
stephen wood is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7th February 2009, 06:23 PM   #9
stephen wood
Member
 
stephen wood's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 227
Default IT'S CLAUBERG...

...a gentle clean has revealed the partially visible W. CLAUBERG SOLINGEN mark on the tang. I have seen kaskaras with Clauberg blades before but none like this broad, single-fullered type.

I understand that Clauberg blades, with their trademark of a man in armour, were known in Arabic-speaking countries as Abu Askari - bearer of the soldier.

I have as yet been unable to take a clear photo of the stamp - here is the same mark on a Civil War Officers' Sabre.

Interesting how some kaskara blades which were thought to be unmarked are revealing maker's marks on, or near, the tang - in this case it had to be the tang as there's no ricasso.
Attached Images
 

Last edited by stephen wood; 8th February 2009 at 03:27 PM.
stephen wood is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25th January 2009, 10:49 PM   #10
katana
Member
 
katana's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Kent
Posts: 2,653
Default

Hi Stephen ,
have you 'hacked' into my eBay 'watched items' ???? We seem to be following the same items...

I am very dubious of eBay listings stating 'museum identification' ...afterall , if it was true, wouldn't you (as the seller) get a signed,written statement supporting that fact, photograph it and add it to the listing ???

Regards David
katana is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:05 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Posts are regarded as being copyrighted by their authors and the act of posting material is deemed to be a granting of an irrevocable nonexclusive license for display here.