![]() |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 935
|
Good day dear members,
I will soon receive this nice old and strange sword, a parang latok if i'm right. It was described as a dayak sword but it’s not a mandau. The blade seems laminated, Will it match with olds models ... 1800 ?? I will post other/better pics when I get it. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Germany, Dortmund
Posts: 9,435
|
Nice sword!
The blade tip is unusual for a latok! See the pic. taken from Amuk Murugul.Regards, Detlef |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Vikingsword Staff
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 6,378
|
Has anyone tried cutting with one of these swords in the style that Xasterix uses?
On first look they seem like they would be unwiedly to use as a combat weapon, especially if used single handed. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Vikingsword Staff
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: The Aussie Bush
Posts: 4,540
|
It would be helpful to see a picture of the whole sword, but the evidence so far suggests this is a parang latok. Van Zonneveld says that the hilts on these are almost always wooden, but I have an example that has a bone hilt too. Fran, yours is only the second one I have seen with a bone hilt, and the hilt mounted in this fashion.
Regards, Ian. P.S. I found a thread where my example was discussed on the forum previously. There is some mention of a similar weapon used by the Land Dyaks called a buko. Also discussed inn that thread were soe characteristics that help distinguish between a parang latok (Sea Dyak) from buko (Land Dyak). Hope this is helpful to thinking about the sword posted above. Last edited by Ian; 15th November 2025 at 05:05 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 935
|
Thank you all for your comments !!
I receive it and think proudly I did quickly a good job the blade was rusty and dirty, so I began to ckean it with vinegar , cola and 1000 sand paper, The problem and quality I have :when I begin , I can’t stop... the blade shows now a really nice lamination. . There are small holes at the basis of the hilt, I think there were haïr attached ?? For the efficience of the blade, It is really thick at basis and really thin and sharp at tge end. For strike, I would grab it too with the first part of the iron hilt, This way it feels really ́’ confortable ́’ as a big machete. That’s the way they used it , handle it with both hands. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 935
|
And these more
I forgot the size ; total length without scabbard 65cm/ 25,6 inches Kind regards |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Germany, Dortmund
Posts: 9,435
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 574
|
Hi All,
This is making my eyes go crazy. I have and example with the same type of tip but the cutting edge on mine is on the curved side and the spine is straight (with a 7.25” [18.415cm] false edge). Sincerely, RobT |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 935
|
Hello Rob,
As for a yataghan blade ? What seems strange is the handle who don’t seems to match with an ́’efficient’́ use Maybe was it reassembled upside down ? Or isn’t it sharp on both sides ? |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|