![]()  | 
	
| 
	 | 
| 
			
			 | 
		#1 | 
| 
			
			 Member 
			
			
			
			Join Date: Sep 2014 
				
				
				
					Posts: 924
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			Hello dear members, 
		
		
		
			I'm not specialised in Keris, I just receiveded these two, The incomplete model seems recent and of poor quality, the second one seems really better and a bit older, maybe a signature on the brass? mounts ? an old blade on a more recent scabbard ? ( fits well in ) Any help, comment is welcomed. Kind regards  | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
| 
			
			 | 
		#2 | 
| 
			
			 Member 
			
			
			
			Join Date: Jun 2009 
				
				
				
					Posts: 1,740
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			Both krisses are in Solo dress (Central Java), may we see the younger blade in full please? 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	Regards  | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
| 
			
			 | 
		#3 | 
| 
			
			 Member 
			
			
			
				
			
			Join Date: Dec 2019 
				Location: Eastern Sierra 
				
				
					Posts: 511
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			I've always wondered why the Solo pendok is open in the front while the Dogya completely covers the wood of the gandjar. Is it for symbolic reasons or is it purely aesthetic?
		 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	 | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
| 
			
			 | 
		#4 | |
| 
			
			 Member 
			
			
			
			Join Date: Jun 2009 
				
				
				
					Posts: 1,740
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 Quote: 
	
 Regards Last edited by Jean; 8th March 2021 at 05:59 PM.  | 
|
| 
		 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
| 
			
			 | 
		#5 | 
| 
			
			 Member 
			
			
			
			Join Date: Jun 2009 
				
				
				
					Posts: 1,740
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			The engravings on the pendok apparently read as 1807, but if the date uses the Javanese calendar, you have to add 78 so it is equivalent to 1885 AD. 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	Regards  | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
| 
			
			 | 
		#6 | 
| 
			
			 Member 
			
			
			
			Join Date: Sep 2014 
				
				
				
					Posts: 924
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			Hello, 
		
		
		
			thank you all for your comments !! 1885 is already a nice surprise ! Thank's a lot Jean for the translation !! For the second Kriss , I have these pictures for the moment...  | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
![]()  | 
	
	
		
  | 
	
		
  |