![]() |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 5,503
|
I do not know much about Philippine weapons, but am sure I have never seen anything like that.
Doesn't the blade look yataghan-ish? Had it not been for the pommel, I would have thought it was a late 19th century yataghan. Am I imagining? |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Vikingsword Staff
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: The Aussie Bush
Posts: 4,519
|
Hi Ariel:
This appears to be an Ilokano piece from N. Luzon. It probably falls into the general category of a dahong palay, a well recognized Ilokano blade form that has been discussed on this forum a number of times. Perhaps it is the angle of the picture that gives it a somewhat yataghan shape, but usually the width of the blade is uniform up to the area where it narrows to a central point. Ian. Last edited by Ian; 11th January 2019 at 01:55 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 5,503
|
Thanks Ian.
Now I am content: no yataghans in Luzon. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2018
Posts: 703
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 568
|
Hi All,
Would these two Philippine short swords qualify as having yataghan blades? Sincerely, RobT |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Vikingsword Staff
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: The Aussie Bush
Posts: 4,519
|
Hi Rob:
These are two recurved knives/swords, and resemble a yataghan in that way, but I think that is where the similarity ends. Recurved blades are found in many cultures, probably reflecting parallel development. The yataghan is one of many examples. Ian. |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Greenville, NC
Posts: 1,854
|
I believe recurved bayonets were also all the rage for a short while in the mid 19th century. Perhaps some influence from those???... though I am unaware of what bayonets the Filipinos would have seen from armies like the US, Spanish and perhaps even the Dutch.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|