![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 692
|
![]()
I've bought it from Artzi years ago. I still find it very interesting and intriguing piece with an very extraordinary blade. I believe it 15th century. An interesting debate piece I think.
Any comments? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Paris (FR*) Cairo (EG)
Posts: 1,142
|
![]() Quote:
![]() ![]() à + Dom |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 692
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Arms Historian
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Route 66
Posts: 10,192
|
![]()
Hi Valjhun,
I missed this, what a beauty! It is not at all surprising that something this unique could be traced to Artzi....he is truly the connoissuer of unusual and fascinating items. I am curious what sort of attribution he placed on this when you acquired it, as I would expect his comments would be most pertinant. I would presume the present mounts to be 18th century, and the blade, as you have noted would certainly be a great topic for debate. While in some regards the blade does have a degree of the look of the earlier blades ( I am not sure I would go as far as 15th century), the magificent chiseled motif on the back of the blade seems later. I am not sure if you might have noticed the thread on the pandours, but I would submit that this might well be a piece that could be attributed to a unit of this or Frei Korps, irregular units of armed forces attached to various military throughout the 18th century. This blade profile seems very much like some of the yataghans and yataghan bladed weapons used by them. The unusual motif in the application on the hilt seems perhaps inclined toward these types of weapon also, at least in my perspective at this point. Best regards, Jim |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 2,818
|
![]()
Interesting motifs on the hilt, I have similar hilt motifs in silver on the unusual version of the Hudiedao that I present in my gallery images.
I do wonder on the nature of these as being purely decorative of having some symbolic meaning? Gav |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 692
|
![]()
Hi! I do not believe that it was a pandour piece. I honestly think, that it is a shortened 15th to 16th century blade rehilted as yatagan. Holding it in hands, the blade seem very old indeed. I'll try to reinforce that theory with some more photos. There is a marking on the blade also. It doesn't seem like a pandours blade, as I've seen quite a lot of blades attributed to Treks' forces and none seems as thatone. The cracquelere on the ivory hilt suggests a 200-300 years old ivory.
I collect yataghans for years now and I've never seem one looking no nearly close to thatone. Hoped you Jim could tell me more about it. I'll post some new photos, the marking also. Thank you! Here is the description from Artzi: "This short and heavy Yataghan sword incorporates an early wide and heavy blade most probably early 18 C. or earlier, forged from pattern welded and twisted steel, 20 inches long and 1 3/4 inches wide. The grips are ivory and the handle mounts are steel, all engraved in a rather simple design. Total length 25 inches. Good condition. Scattered pitted spots on the blade. The handle steel mounts are probably later to the blade and handle and were added to reinforce the sword handle." |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|