![]()  | 
	
| 
	 | 
| 
			
			 | 
		#1 | 
| 
			
			 Member 
			
			
			
				
			
			Join Date: Oct 2008 
				Location: between work and sleep 
				
				
					Posts: 731
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			Hello. I am a beginner in Ethnographic weaponry, and even more of a novice in European types. It occurred to me that the Dutch klewang used against Aceh and in Indonesia was very similar to the cutlass used by the US Navy, and probably by other Western states. I am wondering - were they basically the same or were there subtle but important differences between the two? Thanks.   
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	 
		 | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
| 
			
			 | 
		#2 | 
| 
			
			 Member 
			
			
			
				
			
			Join Date: Jul 2005 
				Location: Toronto, Canada 
				
				
					Posts: 1,242
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			Hi there, 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	My understanding is that the Dutch Hembrug pattern came first, and was later taken on by Milsco in the US with very subtle variations. There has been a fair bit of discussion about these in the past, search the forum for the two makers. I've been keeping my eye out for a Hembrug klewang for a while, I really like the design. Emanuel  | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
| 
			
			 | 
		#3 | 
| 
			
			 Member 
			
			
			
				
			
			Join Date: Mar 2009 
				
				
				
					Posts: 1,064
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			Hi, 
		
		
		
			The Dutch had two types. the left one is klewang no1 , made by A.coppel Solingen the right one, klewang no2 is made at the Hembrug. regards from Holland  | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
| 
			
			 | 
		#4 | 
| 
			
			 Member 
			
			
			
				
			
			Join Date: Mar 2006 
				Location: Room 101, Glos. UK 
				
				
					Posts: 4,259
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			another solingen no. 1. 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			![]() ![]() ![]() other side has a small (proofing?) crowned R mark figure. mine was supposedly captured from a german schnellboot (e-boat) in the channel during ww2, and was apparently confiscated from a dutch supply by the deutsche kriegsmarine. the scabbard may not be the original type shown in the earlier post, possibly they got a bit mixed and matched in the armoury. i had a relative by marriage who was a royal navy officer and captained a british mtb boat at the time, so this one has some personal meaning. he lost a leg in combat with a schnellboot. the e-boat capt, apparently lost an arm, and after the war they managed to meet each other over a few beers and discussed the battle where they injured each other & parted friends... see also the concurrent forum post here. i've also posted pics of the cold steel copy of the 'USN 1917 cutlass' which was the milsco one. i've seen an online copy of the original plans for the klewang somewhere, and milsco copied it almost exactly. i think a search here on 'klewang' may bring it up. there is also a rather nice book in dutch and/or english on the whole subject of the dutch klewang. we have discussed these ones in great depth earlier. the history is fascinating and worldwide. the same model was apparently used by the dutch, germans, japanese and americans at approx. the same time. (the japanese shortened a bunch of captured ones, butchered the shell guard & issued them as an nco's sidearm.) Last edited by kronckew; 18th June 2009 at 10:07 PM.  | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
| 
			
			 | 
		#5 | 
| 
			
			 Member 
			
			
			
				
			
			Join Date: Dec 2004 
				Location: The Netherlands 
				
				
					Posts: 1,209
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			Search on "Hembrug" and start reading. I'm pretty sure most of your questions will be answered. 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	Enjoy!  | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
| 
			
			 | 
		#6 | 
| 
			
			 Member 
			
			
			
				
			
			Join Date: Oct 2008 
				Location: between work and sleep 
				
				
					Posts: 731
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			Thanks guys! 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	I'm not normally as interested in European arms, but the Dutch klewang is quite interesting to me. I will be doing some reading tonight!  
		 | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
| 
			
			 | 
		#7 | |
| 
			
			 Arms Historian 
			
			
			
				
			
			Join Date: Dec 2004 
				Location: Route 66 
				
				
					Posts: 10,670
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 Quote: 
	
  | 
|
| 
		
 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
| 
			
			 | 
		#8 | 
| 
			
			 Member 
			
			
			
			Join Date: Nov 2008 
				
				
				
					Posts: 334
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			Actualy, I think the influence can be regarded in long term (of centuries) and has been mutual. Sea-going tribes from Indonesia & the Malay peninsula have made use of short sword-like weapons and short spears (much like boarding pikes). Introduction to the marine edge weapons of the western sailors led its way towards the creation of a weapon such as the Parang Nabur, for example.  
		
		
		
			Another example, of the opposite way, can be seen in the former (1960's-1980's) British issue Golok machete for tropical area.  | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
| 
			
			 | 
		#9 | 
| 
			
			 Member 
			
			
			
				
			
			Join Date: Jul 2009 
				Location: Nipmuc USA 
				
				
					Posts: 535
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			The American 1917 has the blade similar to these but the 1917 had a solid basket. What Lynn Thompson of Cold Steel lists his as a 1917, is actually the Milsco version made later in the century. I was suprised by one recently that had a copper basket and shiny blade. According to another respondant, those plated American 1917 versions were truly done up that way for parade and such.  
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	Cheers Hotspur; I think Mike McWatters pages still have similar information  | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
| 
			
			 | 
		#10 | 
| 
			
			 Member 
			
			
			
				
			
			Join Date: Mar 2006 
				Location: Room 101, Glos. UK 
				
				
					Posts: 4,259
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			here's a ref. on the 1917 cutlass.  LINKY 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			while officially declared obsolete in 1949, it apparently was still in use for ceremonial purposes at certain navy schools for long after. i understand some of those may have been plated and otherwise gussied up for display value. the US Navy Ceremonial Guard in Washington, DC (Anacostia Annex) still uses the 1860/61 model of modern mfg. Last edited by kronckew; 2nd July 2009 at 06:47 PM.  | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
| 
			
			 | 
		#11 | 
| 
			
			 Member 
			
			
			
				
			
			Join Date: Jul 2009 
				Location: Nipmuc USA 
				
				
					Posts: 535
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			Chuck!! 
		
		
		
			I like these. http://www.navyandmarine.org/index.htm http://www.history.navy.mil/index.html http://www.cwsmma.org/TheCutlassCaveditsNiche.htm The copper and nickle plated job that surfaced and a ringer of a Neumann 18th century piece that I couldn't pass up and have adopted. Cheers Hotspur; the repro at the bottom already comes with rust and a dark blade  
		 | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
![]()  | 
	
	
		
  | 
	
		
  |