|
29th March 2018, 02:03 PM | #1 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Kingdom of the Netherlands
Posts: 63
|
Greaves-Winston typology
Hi all,
I'm trying to learn more about Burmese dha classifications so I can find out more on a number of dha I have. When digging through Mark Bowditch's site on the matter he often refers to an outdated system that he calls the "Greaves-Winston typology". An internet search found this term only to be used on his site, and on this forum. I wonder, what is the source of this typology? Who are Greaves and Winston and where can I find the text where they classify these items? Thanks in advance! |
29th March 2018, 04:15 PM | #2 |
EAAF Staff
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 7,219
|
Ian Greaves (still on this forum) and Andrew Winston, who formerly was on this forum.
|
29th March 2018, 05:48 PM | #3 | |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 5,503
|
Quote:
|
|
29th March 2018, 07:43 PM | #4 |
EAAF Staff
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 7,219
|
Not so much anymore.
|
3rd April 2018, 01:15 AM | #5 |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 865
|
Hello Peter,
Thanks for bringing up this important topic. Burmese weapon's are certainly very interesting but there is little information published. It certainly is a subject worthy of additional research. From what I remember of the Greaves-Winston typology there was three main Burmese types. 1. Bama/bamar - Ethnic majority of Myanmar, which the swords hand a short handle and curved blade 2. Kachin - northern minority group, whose dha featured a short hand, straight blade with square tip 3. Shan - northern minority whose dha, featured lotus bud pommel, medium size handle and curved blade Ian, certainly could comment about things and I'm sure he might chime in here soon. Last edited by Nathaniel; 3rd April 2018 at 01:57 AM. |
3rd April 2018, 01:59 AM | #6 |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 865
|
*** Also of important note, I know both Andrew W. and Ian G. had stated that this general classification they put together was meant to be the start of a discussion, which they hoped and expected would be in time corrected and built upon.
|
4th April 2018, 05:12 AM | #7 | |
Vikingsword Staff
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: The Aussie Bush
Posts: 4,194
|
Quote:
To respond directly to your questions, I think much of what I wrote already here answers the main thrust of your questions. As to text describing this classification, much of that was on the old Vikingsword UBB site, but that site was hacked and is no longer accessible. Nathaniel has referred you to the Macau "History of Steel" site, and that reflects the thinking of Mark, Andrew and myself about 12 years ago. Since then both Mark and Andrew have largely disappeared from this Forum, and I was also absent for a couple of years due to illness. As a result, the Dha Index and our attempts at the classification of dha/daab came to a halt. New blood is definitely needed to help resume the task! Both Nathaniel and I have been in touch with international experts on Thai swords in recent years. They have helped identify and distinguish between the confusing array of Thai/Lao/Cambodian daab/daav in our various collections, as well as classify numerous online examples, such that a newer and more rational nosology might be attempted for much of the Dha Index. This all takes time and effort, of course, and we are otherwise busy people. Those interested in helping with this type of work might indicate their interest here. Previous attempts to put together such a group were unsuccessful, but perhaps we will find more enthusiastic participation now. Please post your thoughts and ideas. I don't want to hijack Peter's thread, but his questions were broad and inquiring so perhaps he won't mind if we digress a little. Ian. Last edited by Ian; 4th April 2018 at 05:49 AM. |
|
4th April 2018, 07:07 PM | #8 |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: USA
Posts: 1,725
|
You rang?
|
5th April 2018, 06:47 PM | #9 | |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 865
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|