![]()  | 
	
| 
	 | 
| 
			
			 | 
		#1 | 
| 
			
			 Member 
			
			
			
			Join Date: Oct 2011 
				
				
				
					Posts: 54
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			Need your opinion to identify this blade. I have attached naga blade photos. 
		
		
		
			Blade and gonjo length are respectively 43 cm and 11 cm, I myself reckon that this blade is a Javanese blade, but if we see the blade length which is quite big for javanese typical blades, I might classify it as Balinese blade, the blade is on Balinese dress as well. There is also an opinion that the blade could come from most eastern part of east Java. I look forward your opinion..Thanking you in advance.  | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
| 
			
			 | 
		#2 | 
| 
			
			 Keris forum moderator 
			
			
			
				
			
			Join Date: Aug 2006 
				Location: Nova Scotia 
				
				
					Posts: 7,250
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			Yes, almost 17 inches is indeed a long Javanese blade, but this does not look like Balinese work to me.   
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	  One can find many Javanese blades in Bali dress, so i wouldn't necessarily take that into consideration.  | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
| 
			
			 | 
		#3 | 
| 
			
			 Member 
			
			
			
			Join Date: Oct 2011 
				
				
				
					Posts: 54
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			Hi David, thank you for the comment. I totally agree with you, many Javanese blades in Bali dress however the dress particularly original dress, can will give great clue to identify blade origin..Frankly, I am not sure its wrongko in Bali dress, here I attached the wrongko pic probably you can tell me where is the wrongko from whether Bali or Java..
		 
		
		
		
			 | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
| 
			
			 | 
		#4 | 
| 
			
			 Member 
			
			
			
			Join Date: Jun 2009 
				
				
				
					Posts: 1,740
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			This wrongko does not look balinese from the bulky proportions and the lack of carving details on the crosspiece, and the slim stem (rather from East Java?).  
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	I personally wonder whether the blade is really old or artificially aged, the pamor fully covering the naga head does not look natural for instance but I may be wrong.... ![]() Regards  | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
| 
			
			 | 
		#5 | |
| 
			
			 Keris forum moderator 
			
			
			
				
			
			Join Date: Aug 2006 
				Location: Nova Scotia 
				
				
					Posts: 7,250
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 Quote: 
	
 ![]() I think you are right to suspect, though, that this dress is not Balinese. It might just be the angle that you photographed it, but wrongko does not look to be the right shape and proportion for Balinese sheaths of this type, so maybe E. Java is it's origins after all. Also it's wearing a Javanese mendak.     
		 | 
|
| 
		 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
| 
			
			 | 
		#6 | 
| 
			
			 Member 
			
			
			
				
			
			Join Date: Dec 2009 
				
				
				
					Posts: 331
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			IMHO the only part which COULD be considered Balinese is the hilt. I think that the bade is definitely non-Balinese.
		 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	 | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
| 
			
			 | 
		#7 | 
| 
			
			 Vikingsword Staff 
			
			
			
				
			
			Join Date: Nov 2004 
				
				
				
					Posts: 6,376
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			The dress also appears quite new judging from the pictures .
		 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	 | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
![]()  | 
	
	
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread | 
| Display Modes | |
		
  | 
	
		
  |