![]()  | 
	
| 
	 | 
| 
			
			 | 
		#1 | 
| 
			
			 Member 
			
			
			
				
			
			Join Date: Jun 2013 
				Location: Netherlands 
				
				
					Posts: 541
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			I couldn't find to much information on superimposed firearms on this forum, so i hope i am not repetetive   
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			  Not to much information from my side for the moment, only pictures i want to share. Hopefully this will spark some discussion   ![]() ![]()  
		Last edited by Robert; 6th December 2013 at 09:11 PM.  | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
| 
			
			 | 
		#2 | 
| 
			
			 (deceased) 
			
			
			
				
			
			Join Date: Sep 2008 
				Location: Bavaria, Germany - the center of 15th and 16th century gunmaking 
				
				
					Posts: 4,310
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			The correct term is superimposed load firearms   
		
		
		
			 , just like the title of D.R. Baxer's standard reference work (hard to find and extremely (!) expensive - I paid 300 euro; a copy is in my own library).P.S. I just noted it's offered at 180 € at abebooks ... The reason of course is that the loads in these guns were superimposed, not the firearms themselves. BTW, sometimes the SEARCH button on the forum is of some help   -  please see my threads:http://www.vikingsword.com/vb/showth...erimposed+load http://www.vikingsword.com/vb/showth...erimposed+load http://www.vikingsword.com/vb/showth...erimposed+load Attached please find a scheme of the superimposed load principle of a four-barreled mid-17th c. wheellock carbine, from D.R. Baxter, 1966. Best, m Last edited by Matchlock; 5th December 2013 at 08:37 PM.  | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
| 
			
			 | 
		#3 | 
| 
			
			 Member 
			
			
			
				
			
			Join Date: Jun 2013 
				Location: Netherlands 
				
				
					Posts: 541
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			Aaaah darn (sorry ) i knew i had seen something similiar before, sorry michael   
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	 
		 | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
| 
			
			 | 
		#4 | 
| 
			
			 Member 
			
			
			
			Join Date: Apr 2010 
				
				
				
					Posts: 672
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			Hello: 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	Just to say that I think that the two arms of the beginning of the thread, are not superimposed loads, but two guns (barrel) Fernando K  | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
| 
			
			 | 
		#5 | 
| 
			
			 (deceased) 
			
			
			
				
			
			Join Date: Sep 2008 
				Location: Bavaria, Germany - the center of 15th and 16th century gunmaking 
				
				
					Posts: 4,310
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			Although I did not author this thread: exactly, Fernando K, thanks!  
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	Of course these are locks from over-and-under-barrel guns, not from superimposed-load firearms. Marcus?   Best, Michael  | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
| 
			
			 | 
		#6 | 
| 
			
			 Member 
			
			
			
				
			
			Join Date: Jun 2013 
				Location: Netherlands 
				
				
					Posts: 541
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			correct again, ouch not a good day for me.   
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	  The multiple bullets on a row configuration is know to me, but i doubt it was used to often. I read that the bullets tended to get stuck inside the barrel? On the other hand, i have seen replica's beeing fired without trouble. (not because they where replica's but because there is a lot of sense in the idea). if i remember correctly (and that is pretty hard for me today apparently) i recall a firearm which used a trail of gunpowder in the middle of 2 barrels. With multiple holes in the barrel with a corresponding load of powder and bullet lined up.  | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
![]()  | 
	
	
		
  | 
	
		
  |