Quote:
|
Originally Posted by harrywagner
... What I am suggesting is that there is no reason collectors cannot adopt a scheme of their own, for their own collection. Those are really basic metadata elements. I have no doubt it could be improved upon ...
|
Maybe i am missing something Harry but, if i understand you correctly, this is a vital basic for keeping a collection; either for your own guidance or for insurance purposes ... or even for your successors if and when you kick the bucket, so they know what they have and to deal with.
I also think nmany collectors already practice such habit.
I keep a record of all items, split by (
1) firearms, (
2) white arms and (
3) diverse.
Organized by:
- Item number ... although i don't stick a label to the pieces, which is an option.
-
Type ... sword, pistol, etc.
-
Origin ... Country, area.
-
Model ... basket hilt, box lock, etc.
-
Serial number ... when existing.
-
Marks/inscriptions.
-
Seller/trader.
-
Age.
-
Description details ... full as possible, incl. dimensions, weight, etc
-
Price acquired.
-
Date acquired.
-
Hiperlink to photos ... of my own archives.
When i update my little collection to the Insurance company, i copy all the above, except the Seller/trader column. No need to transmit such info.
Basicaly when you buy a piece, very often some of the particulars to be recorded are not available; then you have to browse the net, consult the forum and all that ... like you would give your kingdom to reach the info to fill all those columns. But that's what makes all the fun.
-