Quote:
|
Originally Posted by spiral
I think the point here that people are arguing about is Ibrahim states that all solid bladed straight kattara with the typical Omani style hilt. {Not the all metal one.} are fake. {He believes only the curved ones ar for fighting.}
That all swords of that type should have very bendy blades & just be used for dancing. {since around 1774!}
But the modern copies he shows & the information he pronounces as gospel, that comes from the fakers of modern day marriages look like the copies they are.
But to malign every stiff bladed kattara ever sold or collected in the west {excepting the all metal hilts.} as fake, without substantiating it is wrong.
To say non of these swords were ever used in battle is wrong.
To say the sword was not very important unlike spears or guns after C.1744 is also wrong.
IMHO
Spiral
|
Please note;In order to help you differentiate the 3 swords I have placed above the pictures at #135. There's~
1.The Old Omani Battle Sword. Battle Sword. Straight and stiff.
2.The Curved Kattara. Merchant and Slavers Sword. Curved. Quite rigid..
3.The Omani Dancing Sword. Pageants and Salutations ...The Dynastic Item...Dynasty started 1744 but sword would have taken time to promote perhaps 15 years. Straight and very flexible.
Ibrahiim al Balooshi.