Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Mark Bowditch
I am going to go against the tide of opinion and say that it is Burman (as in the tribe after which Burma is named). The wide fuller and floral lotus pommel say Burma to me. Compare it to this one, which I am certain is Burman based on the presence of koftgari (plus the Burmese script is a dead give-away  ).
 |
Hi Mark.
Notice I hedged my bets on the pommel?
Have we seen many Burman swords with handles of this length? I know this is not a "cast in stone" feature, but lotus-bud pommels do appear on Thai swords as well, and if the handle was shorter and three-sectioned like your example, you'd have complete agreement from me. Perhaps an example of cross-polination?
The struck marks at the forte are interesting. I suspect a smith's mark (no great guess).
Andrew