Further to comments in respect of the dhapur of this blade.
A check of the Surakarta pakem reveals that Kebo Kanthong is not shown in this pakem; neither is Kebo Giri, nor Mahesa Kanthong; Laler Mengeng is shown , and although it has the salient features of Kai Wee's blade, those features are interpreted differently.
In the volume that contains this pakem, a number of dhapurs are listed that are acknowledged as not appearing in the original pakem.
This list does not contain the names of any of the dhapur that I have mentioned above, but it does contain the name of Mahesa Kanthong.
Now here is something interesting:-
"kebo" is low level Javanese (ngoko) for "water buffalo"
"mahesa" ( or maesa) is high level Javanese (krama) for "water buffalo"
Since keris terminology should probably be given in krama, rather ngoko, it would seem that although "kebo" this, that and the other, in reference to dhapur is the common usage, the correct usage could perhaps be taken to be "Mahesa Kanthong".
From where I'm standing, it looks like my old dealer informant of some years ago was the person who was perhaps closest to the mark
|