Ethnographic Arms & Armour - View Single Post - Islamic Arms and Armor in The Metropolitan Museum of Art

mariusgmioc · 2nd February 2016, 01:00 PM

I just got my copy today and I can say it is a monumental work illustrating some magnificent and unique weapons. However, it definitely is quite far from a reference book as it avoids using specific technical terms and sometimes even uses them erroneously. For example, all curved blade swords are called "saber" whether it is a Persian Shamshir (page 182), an Ottoman Kilij (page 161) or an Indian Tuwar (page 184). It goes as far as calling "dagger" an archetipal single edged Persian Kard (page 222). It also uses the generic and rather inaccurate term "crucible steel" for describing Wootz.
Overall, the book certainly looks beautiful but it sounds like being written by the museum's photographer, and not by a reputed authority in the field.

2nd February 2016, 01:00 PM	#10
mariusgmioc Member Join Date: Sep 2014 Location: Austria Posts: 1,873	first critic I just got my copy today and I can say it is a monumental work illustrating some magnificent and unique weapons. However, it definitely is quite far from a reference book as it avoids using specific technical terms and sometimes even uses them erroneously. For example, all curved blade swords are called "saber" whether it is a Persian Shamshir (page 182), an Ottoman Kilij (page 161) or an Indian Tuwar (page 184). It goes as far as calling "dagger" an archetipal single edged Persian Kard (page 222). It also uses the generic and rather inaccurate term "crucible steel" for describing Wootz. Overall, the book certainly looks beautiful but it sounds like being written by the museum's photographer, and not by a reputed authority in the field. Last edited by mariusgmioc; 2nd February 2016 at 02:24 PM.