In this matter under discussion, this is the situation as I understand it:-
The notes that G. E. Rumphius used to produce his masterwork were gathered in the 1600's and not published until the 1700's.
In this work he makes a comment based upon (at best) third or fourth hand information that infers a talismanic quality being attributed to suasa in what, at that time, was Mataram (Central Jawa).
So let us assume that it was at least rumoured that at some time, in some place suasa might have had some sort of talismanic quality attributed to it. Let us further assume that during the 1600's, in Central Jawa, suasa had a talismanic value attributed to it.
Personally, I have no problem at all with this, because in Jawa, talismanic values are attributed to just about everything under the sun (& moon & stars). Nothing exists or happens without having some sort of value being attributed to it by somebody.
However, I do have a couple of questions in respect of the comments attributed to G.E. Rumphius:-
1) are these comments on suasa sourced from a VOC journal?
2) in what published work are the reports of metallurgical examinations of suasa, sourced from the Dutch East Indies, reported?
and
3) do we know of any other historical reports that attribute talismanic qualities to suasa, in any other place in the geographic locations where suasa was produced?
|