Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Jim McDougall
Just to be more specific Marius.
This pata, as I noted, has a central fuller which is very much like European blades, most notably schiavona, which often were Solingen made. These central fuller blades were sometimes known to be of African production, however most often imported into Sudan in 1870s-80s (Suakin was one Red Sea entrepot). Peres and Clauberg were noted makers that come to mind. If this blade is not so marked it might be a blank from Solingen.
It is not Indian made .....question, why would the langet/bolster be riveted into the fuller? I am under the impression this might compromise the blade if drilled through. Perhaps that is why these central fuller blades might not be chosen by Indian armourer? or ?
Just asking for your valued opinion, and trying to offer helpful suggestions pending more useful responses.
|
Thank you Jim for your thoughts!
My blade can definitely be of European origin as European bladesmiths definitely had the knowledge to produce blades with such properties.
But then, if the blade was made in Europe, for what type of sword was it made because it would be too thin and elastic for any type of European sword I know?! It would only be suitable for an Indian Pata, that employs a very particular fighting style where a very elastic blade is required.
PS: Here is a link to an older thread about a Pata with a blade very similar to mine, and apparently equally elastic:
http://www.vikingsword.com/vb/showthread.php?p=92078