Pak Ganja, could I most humbly suggest that you return to the post of mine which shows a keris with pamor poleng, and my remark that "there are some clever little fellers in Aeng Tong-Tong."
Is it not logical that this remark applies to the image of the keris that I posted, rather than the image that you posted?
The keris of which I posted an image is an Aeng Tong-Tong production.
The "not quite Pauzan Pusposukadgo" refers to the very obvious fact that the quality of the keris of which I posted an image is far below the quality of the Keris made by Pak Pus, of which you post an image.
Additionally, I consider it inaccurate to refer to the keris made by Pak Pauzan as "a keris-like object".
This is most definitely a keris.
On the other hand, the artistic creations of some current era makers are most definitely not keris, even though they may be very fine works of art.
|