We all have our own preferences, true, but words do have a definite meaning, and that meaning is set down in dictionaries.
The original use of the word patina applied only to bronze, and described the usually green incrustation that old bronze can achieve, however as time passed this use was extended to other materials, in respect of patina as it applies to wood, the meaning is pretty much as I gave it:-
the gloss or sheen on wooden furniture produced by age and polishing (Oxford).
This is also the way in which the word "patina" is understood in the antique furniture trade, it is not just an empty dictionary definition.
In the English language use of the word dates from about 1750.
However, dirt is something different to patina:- dirt hides patina, it does not enhance it.
If we like dirt on something as evidence of its age, that is a personal preference, and I would never speak against personal preferences.
But dirt is not patina.
In respect of keris, we are dealing with an iconic cultural object.
It is in fact disrespectful to the spirit and inherited presence of a keris to leave it accomodated in dirty or inferior dress.
If we choose to retain the old dress that it is in when we acquire it, that old dress should be put into as good condition as is possible, out of respect for the keris. However, if the old dress has already deteriorated beyond a restorable state, then we should provide the keris with new clothes.
In my opinion Detlef has acted in exactly the right manner where the keris under discussion is concerned:- he has paid respect to the keris and he has sympathetically restored and cleaned the existing dress, which will ensure that it is preserved for the future.
|