Ethnographic Arms & Armour - View Single Post

Matchlock · 29th September 2010, 07:58 PM

Hi cornelistromp,

I cannot believe that nobody has responded to your thread so far, so I feel kind of obliged to leave my favorite field and have a go at this.

Viking? NO WAY.

It's the fragment of a South German ca. 1535 Landsknecht backsword. Look at the pommel. The quillons are missing as well as the wooden cord bound and leather or velvet covered grip.

I attach images of a similar pommel of a contemporary Landsknecht dagger sold at Bonhams in spring, and of a sword sold at Christie's.

For lots of more illustrations, please see my former thread on Katzbalgers and related Landsknecht swords:

http://www.vikingsword.com/vb/showth...ght=katzbalger

Best,
Michael

29th September 2010, 07:58 PM	#2
Matchlock (deceased) Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: Bavaria, Germany - the center of 15th and 16th century gunmaking Posts: 4,310	Hi cornelistromp, I cannot believe that nobody has responded to your thread so far, so I feel kind of obliged to leave my favorite field and have a go at this. Viking? NO WAY. It's the fragment of a South German ca. 1535 Landsknecht backsword. Look at the pommel. The quillons are missing as well as the wooden cord bound and leather or velvet covered grip. I attach images of a similar pommel of a contemporary Landsknecht dagger sold at Bonhams in spring, and of a sword sold at Christie's. For lots of more illustrations, please see my former thread on Katzbalgers and related Landsknecht swords: http://www.vikingsword.com/vb/showth...ght=katzbalger Best, Michael Attached Images Last edited by Matchlock; 29th September 2010 at 08:20 PM.