Quote:
Originally Posted by ALEX
I agree, this knife was made to look in Uzbek style. The only blade is not of Uzbek form, and this only feature makes it non-ethnographic.
Marius, would you agree if the blade be of proper pchak form it'd be ethnographic knife?
Here's another blade from the same source but in distinctively Uzbek pchak shape, the rest is identical. Granted, this blade would make a better match with the scabbard, making it a modern ethnographic pchak. With the present knife, its a hybrid of hunting blade in pchak fittings.
Tim, thanks for posting your knife. similar pattern and form indeed.
|
I also collect modern knives but I do not appreciate modern "ethnic" knives fitted with blades mass produced somewhere else.
But this is how I see things with modern made knives, and should not influence you too much.
After all, even in the past blades were mass produced in one country, then fitted in an ethnic sword in other country. And you can find this almost evrywhere: Indian firangi swords; Turkish shamshirs with Persian blades; Scottish broadswords with "Adria Farara" German blades; native American knives with English Sheffield blades; Moroccan koumyia knives with French blades; etc.