View Single Post
Old 12th August 2007, 02:59 AM   #16
rand
Member
 
rand's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Virginia
Posts: 538
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ham
Your assumption is inaccurate, unfortunately. This too, is a 19th century rehilt as are many of the others displayed in various Turkish museums. The guard and pommel are Persian or Afghan work, and there is a strong tendency for grips on this type to be leather-covered wood.
The mounts of the swords of the Rightly Guided Ones, preserved in the Reliquary at Topkapi, are more or less all 16th century; they are a reasonably reliable reference for mounts of that period. See
Yucel, Unsal: Islamic Swords and Swordsmiths, Istanbul: IRCICA, 2001.

Ham
Hi Ham,

Are you refering to quote "Most of the swords housed in the Holy Relics section at the Topkapi Palace Museum were, following the conquest of Egypt, repaired and redecorated between 923-927 hijia C.E. In most cases their hilts and scabbards were completely replaced" , page 64, Islamic Swords and SwordSmiths.

Looked but found no mention of Suleymans sword in Yucels book.

The crossguard on Suleymans sword pictured above sword looks a later replacement to me, especially the shape of the ends of the quillons does not fit 16th century style. The pierce work on the crossguard on it looks more to the Persian taste.

rand
rand is offline   Reply With Quote