View Single Post
Old 12th September 2008, 03:29 AM   #5
Ed
Member
 
Ed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 200
Default

It's a nice piece but I'd venture that it is later than 16th c. The grips are a bit problematic. That terminal on the pommel says 17th. c. to me.
Ed is offline   Reply With Quote