Quote:
|
Originally Posted by mariusgmioc
I beg to differ on this one! 
Khanjar is a Persian/Arabic word and they use it for their single curved daggers.
It was imported to India together with the expansion of the Mughal Empire and so the Indians adopted the term for many of their daggers (especially those from the Northern part), single or double curved.
Restricting the term to only double curved daggers, I think would be wrong as it would exclude precisely the daggers where it originated from.
PS: You can also check what Artzi has to say on this one too!  |
Sorry, I have to go with Stuart Cary Welch here.
Quote:
|
His first paid position at Harvard was in 1956, as honorary assistant keeper of Islamic Art at the Fogg Museum. He later developed one of the first curricula for Islamic and Indian art. He was curator of Islamic and Later Indian art at the Harvard Art Museum, and from 1979 to 1987, he was also special consultant for the department of Islamic art at the Metropolitan Museum of Art. Welch taught at Harvard until his retirement in 1995, and he donated much of his collection to the school. The remainder of his personal collection was auctioned by Sotheby's in 2011. On 6 April 2011, a single page from the Shahnameh of Shah Tahmasp (The Houghton Shahnameh) of which Weich was the leading scholar, was sold for 7.4 million pounds ($12 million).
|
Do you really think that these completely different blade types should have the same name?