Azeri weapons have always been a weak point of mine. There are many reasons why I think they are not very well known:
a. Until 1915 the name Azerbajan was is use only in a very small circle, more commonly the people were refered to as "tatars", so a lot of things that are written in old caucasian books about tatars are actually about azeris.
b. Azerbajan "fell off" the scope of Astvatsaturjan's work.
c. It's hard to define what Azerbajan is. Is Derbent (Dagestan), which until recently was populated mostly by "tatar" - Azerbajan ? What about northern Azerbajan, populated by Lezgins ? What about cities that traditionally had high percentage of armenians ? Afaik Azerbajan used to be northern Iran - does it mean that when we see an iranian weapon we should say "possibly azerbajan" ?
As a results from most of the things I've seen, my opinion is that Azerbajan's work is either Dagestani (Northern Azerbajan) or armenian.
This kindjal sort of looks like typical transcaucasian - 3 rivets hilt, extremely long, typical transcaucasian koftgari, somewhat conical point, typical transcaucasian "large" blade - one off-centered fuller. There are couple of things that are more specific for this kindjal, (central rivet is oval, interesting scabbard), but if I would have to express my opinion on this piece I would not go farther than "Transcaucasian, with a good chanse of being made outside of Georgia".
I hope that more knowladgeble people will enlighten us on Azeri kindjals.
P.S. long time ago I was once told that there is such thing as "typical Azeri" kindjals, with very specific form of the hilt (hard to describe in words), but since I almost never saw such thing in real life, I wonder if its true.
P.P.S. There was a really good catalogue - "Vostochnoe Oruzhie" ("Eastern weapons"), that was based entirely on Azerbajan's museums. Some of the weapons presented there were completely unique (like a version of Laz Bichaq, in a _knife_ size) but most of them were not even azerbajani (they had kukri and lots of Qajar stuff).
|